Possibly not on Page. But on anything involving cyber ... by months.
-
-
-
Replying to @empiricalerror @joshuamanning23
OK. My job is not to defend Steele. Maybe Mueller met with him to find out who was spreading disinfo.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @joshuamanning23
i don't perceive you as defending steele. but, like you, i've done my homework on this. there is nothing in the dossier that was not...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... already publicly reported elsewhere before.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel
So true. But his reporting backs up a lot. And makes many things clearer. It presents a place to put your fingers when climbing.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @joshuamanning23 @empiricalerror
Give me 13 stories from the WaPo. That'd do a better job than Steele and have various forms of evidence to back them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror
Yes. But Steele was there last year. Where was the WaPo? I turn to them now but Steele is a backbone to it. Multi-sources.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshuamanning23 @empiricalerror
Nah. His sources repeat. One of their stories has 9 sources. WaPo has different KINDS of reporters reporting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
While Steele may not have preceded particular publicly available info, how would he have known what to include, exclude?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
He could have asked people to confirm deny. The Alfa report--which BF is getting sued over--seems to be case of feedback loop on FBI.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.