They just have the date wrong. That is covered later though in Steele’s reports.
Nah. His sources repeat. One of their stories has 9 sources. WaPo has different KINDS of reporters reporting.
-
-
While Steele may not have preceded particular publicly available info, how would he have known what to include, exclude?
-
he included what was already in the public domain at the time and what his sources repeated back to him in an embellished form.
-
everything that _was not_ in the public domain already is conspicuously missing from the dossier. hmm...
-
So why would the FBI & Mueller bother w/ Steele dossier & the man himself, if he was leading his sources? Why would he do that?
-
Perhaps to ALSO learn who was disinforming, as well as informing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.