1/ Unfair to imply crass dismissal of FBI needs as “not my problem.” No one told FBI it’s OK to search for Americans it can’t legally targethttps://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/915201852513415170 …
8 total--there's a list at fn33. https://s3.amazonaws.com/demandprogress/reports/Institutional_Lack_of_Candor.pdf … But they appear to have changed back.
-
-
& there's been no notice in cases where they're surely also using 702: like Chinese-American scientists (Xiaoxiang Xi) or CP (Hassanshahi)
-
As I'll write later this week, I'd bet $$ they used 702 in the Gartenlaub case too.
-
ODNI cites US v Mohamud and US v Hasbajrami rulings in support of the contention that no warrant is required to query 702 take.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.