It is, and still is, but it’s basically out of touch with reality. ppl want “cyberwar” to be same as “war requires declaration from congress
-
-
Replying to @thegrugq @AthertonKD
Essentially their definition of cyberwar would mean there never has or will be one, just like America hasn’t been at war since 1945.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq @AthertonKD
By whatever technicality and legal standard that maybe, and however happy that may make some folks, it is simple ludicrous
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq @AthertonKD
Like if you did a lecture on the Vietnam war and someone came by to denounce you because it was a policing action, not a war.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq @AthertonKD
Cyberwar is a conflict involving humans, waged with computers and information. That’s my view. And I’m sticking to it. :)
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq @AthertonKD
Does it become war when there are physical effects? (Power grid knocked out, centrifuges busted) Or when somebody dies from it?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What's a physical effect tho? And how attenuated can it be?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That is the question, isn't it? I mean, so far nothing has exceeded
@CyberSquirrel1 impact afaik.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thepacketrat @thegrugq and
Also does measuring physical damage over other things assign more value to property than people?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
And where does negligence of target factor in?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.