And I'm pointing out that you raised SSCI suspects as if it wasn't precisely what you're complaining about now. Huh.
Thanks. I may write this up to give you ONE more chance to answer yes or no.
-
-
Thanks Mark. Appreciate that you've finally gone on the record for all but this key question. Glad you've got your side out.
-
Honestly, absent a waiver, how can he answer you?
-
Simple. He can say, "Yes, I'm not answering that Q bc answering it would be a violation of a/c."
-
But that round about way still violates a/c priv. It also could impact other continuing duties such as loyalty.
-
Attorneys aren’t able to say “A/C priv but read between the lines.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.