.@emptywheel your site is not permitting @MarkSZaidEsq to submit a detailed response to your analysis. Please advise so he can do so.
Oh. Huh. And you raised the same point in your comments, as if I hadn't raised it. Damned if I do, damned if I don't, I guess.
-
-
Except I was there, and you weren't. But obviously that's just an inconsequential difference.

-
You were at the trial? That's funny. I didn't see you there. Where were you sitting?
-
I'm referring to interactions with the FBI that you're speculating about. Yes, I realize you think you're expert now bc you attended trial
-
And I'm pointing out that you raised SSCI suspects as if it wasn't precisely what you're complaining about now. Huh.
-
My statement on your blog addresses the issues. People can refer to that.
-
So no, you cannot answer, yes or no, whether you aren't saying whether you informed Sterling abt FBI convo bc a/c? Yes or no?
-
I very clearly answered this question already. Sorry that you don't understand.
-
Please show me where you said "yes" in response to a direct question.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.