.@emptywheel your site is not permitting @MarkSZaidEsq to submit a detailed response to your analysis. Please advise so he can do so.
-
-
Absent his waiver, I am not permitted to reveal any communications I had with my client Jeff Sterling. Fundamental concept.
-
Please answer question directly. Are you maintaining that you can't say whether you informed him you spoke to FBI bc it is covered by a/c?
-
He's saying yes. He cannot reveal any discussions w/ clients, about almost anything related to the representation, w/o the client's consent.
-
No. Actually he's not. Again I can write this up for people who are struggling with it.
-
Please do that, then. B/c I have no clue what other thing you think he's saying here beyond "you are asking abt a privileged communication."
-
He's pointedly stopping well short of that, in fact. Or even saying more generally that he's not answering bc of a/c.
-
Not as I read him. He's saying he can't respond to your question b/c you are asking about atty-client comms. That's ALL he CAN say.
-
If that were true he could simply answer "yes," which is what I was asking. But he has refused to do that.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.