.@emptywheel your site is not permitting @MarkSZaidEsq to submit a detailed response to your analysis. Please advise so he can do so.
-
-
Wait, Marcy, are you saying you've been in contact with Jeff? Why don't you ask him then if he told Mark he was going to leak CLASS info?
-
Because if he says he did not, then Hunt's attempt to connect the issue to Sterling is null and void.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Be my guest. That's your First Amendment right to do so.
-
To be clear: you maintain that you're not answering whether you informed Sterling you spoke w/FBI bc it is covered by a/c?
-
Absent his waiver, I am not permitted to reveal any communications I had with my client Jeff Sterling. Fundamental concept.
-
Please answer question directly. Are you maintaining that you can't say whether you informed him you spoke to FBI bc it is covered by a/c?
-
He's saying yes. He cannot reveal any discussions w/ clients, about almost anything related to the representation, w/o the client's consent.
-
No. Actually he's not. Again I can write this up for people who are struggling with it.
-
Please do that, then. B/c I have no clue what other thing you think he's saying here beyond "you are asking abt a privileged communication."
-
He's pointedly stopping well short of that, in fact. Or even saying more generally that he's not answering bc of a/c.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How about stop guessing abt what you think a doc you've never seen says? Thats neither journalism nor legitimate analysis.
-
Oh. Huh. And you raised the same point in your comments, as if I hadn't raised it. Damned if I do, damned if I don't, I guess.
-
Except I was there, and you weren't. But obviously that's just an inconsequential difference.

-
You were at the trial? That's funny. I didn't see you there. Where were you sitting?
-
I'm referring to interactions with the FBI that you're speculating about. Yes, I realize you think you're expert now bc you attended trial
-
And I'm pointing out that you raised SSCI suspects as if it wasn't precisely what you're complaining about now. Huh.
-
My statement on your blog addresses the issues. People can refer to that.
-
So no, you cannot answer, yes or no, whether you aren't saying whether you informed Sterling abt FBI convo bc a/c? Yes or no?
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I introduced your 302 by explaining that i was probably about SSCI & Duhnke. What could be more favorable to you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.