In fulfilling @charlie_savage 702 FOIA, IC reclassified dates that make it clear they could have given Wyden USP #s.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/23/the-reclassification-of-details-on-the-2011-upstream-fight/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Tho determining whether a com is wholly domestic (Bates study) much easier than determining whether it's 1-end domestic (Wyden request) /1
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @emptywheel
For example since targets have to be foreigners abroad, any com to or from a targeted selector can be deemed "not wholly domestic" /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @emptywheel
So computer crunch could rule out all those for Bates. No equivalent for trying to ID locations of all non-targeted users for Wyden /3endit
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @charlie_savage
True. But one of Wyden's q in newly released letter was whether any totally law abiding got sucked up. So totally domestic on mct
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
And given requests from both Bates and Wyden should have gotten domestic SCTs
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.