Not directly, AFAIK
-
-
Replying to @kurtopsahl @mikeyang and
not in a published decision but the fact that it is part of the current warrant for content ECPA discussion pretty well confirms it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agidari @kurtopsahl and
It'll get tested if a committee asks FB for what they gave mueller, IF FB resists subpoena. But that would be bad politics for FB.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang @kurtopsahl and
Reasonable people can disagree on the politics - I'd say the same if HRC were president. ECPA says what it says and no Cong. exception.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agidari @kurtopsahl and
Not partisan politics. When anti-trust talk is in the air, it's not helpful for companies to stiff Congress on Russian interference.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang @agidari and
But Congress hasn't asked here, w/a subpoena. Right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @MiekeEoyang @emptywheel and
They will try to resolve through simple letter requests before going to subpoena. But refusing requests is fraught.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang @agidari and
Perhaps, but I think that's what this whole media campaign is about. To increase the fraughtness for something that is actually more complex
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @agidari and
Yeah, but don't assume the leverage is on the privacy side. There are so many other things big companies want from Congress.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This is related. I don't think this is about the ad buys, per se. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/07/facebooks-global-data-a-parallel-intelligence-source-rivaling-nsa/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.