And the evidence of what RU targeted is that they targeted the stupidest people imaginable.
I'm saying neither WSJ nor CNN affirm there was, and any idiot pretending they do to write THREADS is suspect. And ALSO I think WSJ is wrong
-
-
I find it a little hard to believe the prosecutor wouldn't cover that possibility in his assumptions, also that Facebook wasn't pushed
-
Well then you're as unfamiliar w/public record as he is. Doesn't excuse either one of you.
-
Let's ask!
@dseetharaman@ByronTau@shaneharris, did you guys confirm that Mueller gave Facebook a warrant? MTW thinks you're misleading -
I think the story is misleading, absolutely. But hey, if their editors are ready to confirm warrant, let's hear it. It'd be BREAKING news.
-
You may be right.
@dseetharaman@ByronTau@shaneharris, this is important. Was the warrant report an assumption or confirmed? -
Not an "assumption." An inference, possibly w/assist of surveillance lawyers, amongst whom there's a ton of debate?
-
@dseetharaman@ByronTau@shaneharris, this is important. Was the warrant confirmed? Did Mueller get a warrant for Facebook? -
@dseetharaman@ByronTau@shaneharris, this is important. Was the warrant confirmed? Did Mueller get a warrant for Facebook? >your silence
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.