Not only is this YET ANOTHER speculative post taking CNN's weak confirmation as its base but it includes several things I know to be wrong.https://twitter.com/TPM_dk/status/909875533999218689 …
-
Show this thread
-
Again, CNN does what WSJ does: say FB MUST have required a warrant, when that's not true. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/16/facebook-doesnt-need-a-probable-cause-search-warrant-to-turn-over-ad-data-to-robert-mueller/ …
2 replies 7 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
Who r u expecting to confirm warrant. Mueller is not going to do it & doubtful Facebook would. So it's just endless speculation 4 no reason
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @devdotcom
Even assuming your assumptions abt me correct, it'd only mean all of these endless threads are based on speculation, nothing more.
3:16 PM - 18 Sep 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.