Some legal process is required for FB to turn it over to the govt.
In any case, didn't FB show, but not leave, copies of these w/SSCI with no process?
-
-
I think in "compare SSCI v Mueller," people are forgetting SSCI did not subpoena FB. So it's Mueller legal process v. SSCI voluntary.
-
Also, I don't think that a SSCI subpoena is an admin subpoena for purposes of 2702 exception, let alone GJ subepona.
-
Meaning? That it wouldn't match a D order in any case?
-
Congress could have given itself an exception in ECPA, but did not. Only court can issue a D order.
-
So if Facebook would require a D order then we would already be at a level beyond what Congress could get?
-
As I read ECPA, it requires a D order for some things, and Congress can't issue those. This is good, vs a HUAC with D order power.
-
LOL. I absolutely agree, and like you all I want the rules to be as hard as possible. Just trying to figure out how ad transactions count.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.