No. Because she repeatedly says it's what she suspects. Again, lots of suspicion, incl from me. You--& others--forgetting what evidence is
-
-
Again, your threshold for "evidence" is someone producing it from an ongoing investigation. Sworn testimony,http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article141746659.html …
-
Can you quote what you think is evidence?
-
God hath provided the lamb!http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/09/18/how-to-read-bob-mueller-hand-215616 …
-
"he presented evidence that convinced a federal judge ... foreign individuals committed a crime by making a “contribution”"
-
Yeah. Except his assumptions there are based on bad reporting. So proof that there's no proof.
-
You're saying the WSJ is wrong and there was no warrant?
-
I'm saying neither WSJ nor CNN affirm there was, and any idiot pretending they do to write THREADS is suspect. And ALSO I think WSJ is wrong
-
I find it a little hard to believe the prosecutor wouldn't cover that possibility in his assumptions, also that Facebook wasn't pushed
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.