And while I'm reupping: The (Thus Far) Flimsy Case for Republican Cooperation on Russian Targeting https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/16/the-thus-far-flimsy-case-for-republican-cooperation-on-russian-targeting/ …
You've just admitted you have no evidence but now you've got "those people" you're sure were targeted. That's problem w/spewing w/o evidence
-
-
No, I only concede that no evidence to link Trump to the Russians exists.http://onewisconsinnow.org/press/report-suggests-wisconsin-voters-targeted-by-collusion-between-trump-campaign-russian-fake-news-operation/ …
-
we have evidence that swing voters were targeted. Do you disagree with that?
-
What's that evidence? Beyond the evidence from Trump boasting they did it, which is how elections work?
-
And the evidence of what RU targeted is that they targeted the stupidest people imaginable.
-
Which is why I wrote a post saying that there is no evidence. Bc it says opposite of what you appear to think it does.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.