And while I'm reupping: The (Thus Far) Flimsy Case for Republican Cooperation on Russian Targeting https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/16/the-thus-far-flimsy-case-for-republican-cooperation-on-russian-targeting/ …
-
-
Plus, zero of the people I've seen quoted have worked campaigns.
-
Hillary worked in a campaign. She seems to think the Russians had help with what they took. I'd say you probably need to address that
-
No. Because she repeatedly says it's what she suspects. Again, lots of suspicion, incl from me. You--& others--forgetting what evidence is
-
Moreover, Hillary doesn't have a great record on actual targeting.
-
Do the Russians? I'd say they do have a track record targeting groups that are anti gov't, but those people are separate
-
You've just admitted you have no evidence but now you've got "those people" you're sure were targeted. That's problem w/spewing w/o evidence
-
No, I only concede that no evidence to link Trump to the Russians exists.http://onewisconsinnow.org/press/report-suggests-wisconsin-voters-targeted-by-collusion-between-trump-campaign-russian-fake-news-operation/ …
-
we have evidence that swing voters were targeted. Do you disagree with that?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right - I'm talking
@rgoodlaw@john_sipher#RolfMowattLarsen et al - seems like they have argued the help came during general election - -
Hmmm. Any of them run elections? In the US, I mean?
-
The spy guys?
@just_security peeps?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.