It would also explain why FB would feel free to share it with Mueller (who is probably neck deep in 702 and 12333 intercepts) & not w/SSCI.
-
Show this thread
-
It's not even clear in the CRIMINAL context you'd need a warrant.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Why are communications WITH Facebook not treated as account details under 2703(d), which = relevance, not probable cause, standard.
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
I think the leaks are coming from Facebook. They certainly lie frequently (albeit only on days that end with "y"), but why here?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeffhauser
There is zero leaked assertion in either article that a warrant was used. Just assumptions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
? http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/15/media/facebook-mueller-ads/index.html … Given recent CNN history I have to imagine they have strong sourcing, even if unhinted at in text.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.