That's a reach. She had a trial & legally not treasonous. But just like OJ lot's of ppl think she's guilty. Opinion is separate from trial.
-
-
-
If anonymous morons want to misuse the term, they're invited to look stupid. But when CIA Director misuses it, it's dangerous.
-
Not least bc they guy was cheering Wikileaks a year ago.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
a better argument could be made that the last several CIA directors are traitors
-
I do not endorse calling ANYONE a traitor who is not under the definition in the Constitution. Not Trump, not Manning, not CIA Directors.
-
i hear you, but if we are looking for evidence of treason, i'd look at cia directors. they're certainly domestic enemies of constitution
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
great ex of how carceral state functions; "innocent until proven guilty" except in practice suspicion is often enough to justify exclusion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OJ was found not guilty of murder but most people reasonably believe he is a murderer. Is that wrong too?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And distorts the intent and net effect of her axns: to reveal nature, extent, + cover-up of grave human rights abuses by US military
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Irony is she disjointed the Constitution with her actions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.