Yes, those demographics totally explain why VA responded differently to Comey letter than MI did.
Yup. But still very different response in late deciders. And it goes opposite way you'd think if Comey were all important.
-
-
Also Comey was a herring to non low info voters. I feel only low info voters saw it as a real issue. NoVA most informed part of country
-
Again, I know very few clearance holders who feel that way. Bc they know how they'd be treated in similar circumstances.
-
I have heard that, but most I know knew he letter to congress was just a procedural circus show. Didn't see it as a real new thing.
-
Also non IC Indies in NoVA swung hard against trump. Like absurdly so in some places. Was purely him. Look at Comstock district.
-
Now there's a very different argument to explain differential late votes than "it was Comey." One I find more persuasive, actually.
-
Of course that may be a differential where the little-to-no ads in WI and MI mattered (or the shitty-ass ineffective one w/no policy).
-
If PA was gone, MI/WI stop mattering. They threw a lot at PA. Didn't move ppl.
-
True. Of course, PA is also where the ObamaCare premium increases highest, another late breaking thing Trump focused on.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
NoVA is a huge portion of the vote now, and saw some of the biggest swings in the country to Clinton. MI doesn't have anything similar.
-
Agree. NoVa also has largest concentration of clearance holders who tended to be more critical of Clinton email than others I know.
-
Yeah but they saw the dog and pony show that was. Anyone related to IC/Politics understood that. Lot of them more horrified by Trump.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.