This is straight up nonsense.https://twitter.com/attackerman/status/908378378226585600 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Then who are the people who were actually harmed? Not missions/people put at risk; manifested harm. I am 100% open to consideration.
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
1. Names almost certainly would *not* be known. 2. Knowing counterfactual impossible. 3. Test is "proven manifest harm to single person"now?
4 replies 1 retweet 29 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
For keeping someone who did her time as a permanent pariah? Yes, I think the gov't owes *some measure* quantification of manifested harm.
5 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
Seems like there is some difference between "permanent pariah" and "IOP Fellow at the Kennedy School."
2 replies 0 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
But that's what's animating Morrell's objection: that respectable institutions ought not associate themselves with Manning.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
I think fellow designation is basic endorsement. I wouldn't object to speaker invite etc (though I'm uninterested in what she has to say).
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @attackerman
But I think Morrell is right and understandable to view this an offense and embarrassment and I admire his willingness to stand behind that.
3 replies 1 retweet 17 likes
Willingness to stand against leaks but unwillingness to stand against torture?
-
-
also his casual ideation of killing iranians and russians in syriahttps://theintercept.com/2016/08/09/ex-cia-chief-who-endorsed-clinton-calls-for-killing-iranians-and-russians-in-syria/ …
0 replies 1 retweet 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.