Detailed ACA passed and was an anchor on Dems, including right before Trump's election, until people faced losing it.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Good point. But, still: it passed, and it has survived, and it represents a major improvement over status quo ante, I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Justin_Vogt
For those who aren't forced to pay 9% of their income for health insurance they can't afford to use, I guess. That's not you, though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @Justin_Vogt
That, btw, was a known detail going into ACA: 16-20% of people would still not be able to bc able to access CARE bc of costs.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
I guess here's my final question for you, and then I'll stop bugging you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Justin_Vogt @emptywheel
Have you seen a detailed proposal for single-payer that includes likely scenarios for tax effects? I want to but I haven't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Justin_Vogt
Say. You DO know that many of the taxes detailed in ACA haven't gone into effect? Turns out they were just propaganda.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Justin_Vogt
Have you seen detailed analysis that lays out all those tax plans that turned out to be fake?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
No, and I'd like to. But then I'd still like to see a detailed proposal for single-payer that includes likely scenarios for tax effects.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not detailed analysis but some here. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/04/18/the-obamacare-wonks-are-awfully-selective-about-which-taxes-and-costs-they-see/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.