"How affordable" =/= "whether you'd like them to be lower." Do you forgo necessary care bc you can't afford them?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @Justin_Vogt
But, in any case, your voting record, by itself, is why you're not the audience here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I hear you. But I suspect many ppl who don't vote and/or don't have good employer-based coverage will also be uneasy abt lack of details.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Justin_Vogt
Given that one of things they loathe right now is how many details they have I sort of doubt it. One reason Medicare works is fewer details.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Justin_Vogt
But I admire your certainty that people who can't afford care would prefer some wonk lecturing about what they can't have.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I don't have much certainty about any of this and have expressed very little.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Justin_Vogt
Ah. OK. Well, I suspect, based on details about ACA as implemented, that "more details" is not what sells stuff like this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @Justin_Vogt
In fact, Trump managed to win against all odds by offering almost no details about his policy proposals.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
But that comparison is interesting. Obama and Trump both won. But detailed ACA passed and detail-free Trumpcare failed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Justin_Vogt
Detailed ACA passed and was an anchor on Dems, including right before Trump's election, until people faced losing it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
And detailed ACA with Medicare buy-in could have passed using reconciliation in first go-around.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.