Did that $1B campaign not appropriately deploy its own social machine guns? No, it did not. I chose not to deploy any ads in MI and WI, eg.
Or, say, a competent strategy. For the 10th time I am not denying suppression. I talked about it all the time in real time.
-
-
But the response to voter suppression should not be "hey, I'll simply not campaign in that state."
-
agree, still unconvinced ads and campaign could overcome the technology used to suppress
-
The election was so close in MI and Wi, hard to imagine SOME campaigning couldn't make difference.
-
You still lose, of course, w/PA. But WI and MI would have been winnable w/campaigning there, IMO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.