I'm actually not saying that. Days ago I noted that Obama got elected using those "new" social machine guns. Thing is, they're not new.
-
-
i'm not disagreeing with her noncompetitive campaign. i'm saying she was at disadvantage v tech like cross-check (IVRC), Facebook
-
Why was she at disadvantage on FB? Don't SM consultants take $$? (The answer is she, as usual, picked shitty consultants.)
-
Agree about her consultants. But David duke was in Russia for 5 yrs where movement linked up with Nazis, lots of foreign $ going to divide
-
You do know that the far right actually has more money than Putin? And they spent it? Want to look at far right, look at Mercer's spending.
-
agree. they're heavily funded and invest heavily into subversive measures. putin is only one facet, launderer as much or more than funder
-
Not just launderer, active organizer. Why do you think David Duke spent 5 yrs there?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Not campaigning is different than active measures that suppress vote and target online Russian sponsored social movements
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.