I don't doubt RU bots had an effect, but to suggest that $100K in FB advertising defeated a $1B campaign seems off.
Does that say "far more"? Nope. No evidence for that. Were both a problem? Yup. Is it utter campaign incompetence to run ZERO ads? Yup.
-
-
yes, competitive noneffort is noncompetitive. still a distraction from active measures used in WI to taint tallieshttps://twitter.com/daviottenheimer/status/872174927440338944 …
-
PLEASE do not tell me I have not paid sufficient attention to vote tampering bc I did in real time and tons since & worked IN MI on issue
-
suppression and tampering was far more the issue than ads in WI, as both sides avoided big presence there
-
Outside GOP funders huge in WI. And Trump was huge in MI. I agree suppression was a problem. But Hillary's strategy in WI/MI malpractice.
-
i'd say Kobach/Ryan (both having served Brownback) did actual malpractice. Hilary was noncompetitive http://www.politicususa.com/2017/08/24/kobachs-watch-kansas-tossed-3-times-ballots-like-sized-states.html …pic.twitter.com/NMHzjwKzH2
-
Davi I'm in MI. Trust me. Her campaign here was malpractice.
-
i'm not disagreeing with her noncompetitive campaign. i'm saying she was at disadvantage v tech like cross-check (IVRC), Facebook
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.