No. So please show exactly where sipher argues that
-
-
So if I point to a whole slew of times he did that, you agree it's shoddy logic, even if we don't have 28 years recruiting spies behind us?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Sure -- but i read his article, and all he claimed was the dossier predated the official US intel assessment in jan 2017, which it did
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Again, if I point to numerous examples where Sipher says report that post-dated events predicted those events, you'll agree that's problem?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ive already said sure. this is getting exhausting. get to ur point or im moving on.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This is Sipher using a December report to "predict" bot activity that was widely reported in the press for months.pic.twitter.com/Tbj2JMZhhz
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @ghostandspooky and
Here, he claims that same December report predicted a November Oxford study.pic.twitter.com/UJvvBigIGX
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ghostandspooky and
Here he claims revelations in 2007 and 2015 prove that a dossier prepped in 2016 predicted Cohen's RU (actually, Ukr) ties.pic.twitter.com/AYnBpyqzPS
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ghostandspooky and
Why r you using the word predicted. confused or something? Read it again. Info from many different sources confirms orbis report.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rainerickson @ghostandspooky and
Maybe you should tell Sipher it is prohibited to use the word before telling me? It's his word.pic.twitter.com/0AQ8EZZaWP
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But the more important problem is a November 2016 report does not "confirm" a 2016 report. The latter may be derivative of it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.