Sure -- but i read his article, and all he claimed was the dossier predated the official US intel assessment in jan 2017, which it did
-
-
Again, if I point to numerous examples where Sipher says report that post-dated events predicted those events, you'll agree that's problem?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ive already said sure. this is getting exhausting. get to ur point or im moving on.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This is Sipher using a December report to "predict" bot activity that was widely reported in the press for months.pic.twitter.com/Tbj2JMZhhz
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
i dont have time to go thru the press from summer-fall of 16 to see what was def known & what wasnt -- but hes claiming something specific
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You don't have to!! That's why I laid that all out in the post. I'm getting feeling you didn't read the post.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
i read the post and found it to be just as unconvincing as ur points are here. ur assuming hes making broad claims when what hes actually
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ghostandspooky @emptywheel and
claiming is that the dossier had narrow and specific insights which were not publicly known at the time
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Look, you've conceded what he did is wrong, but won't admit it. That's fine. But let's leave it there, bc it's quite clear what you're doing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
u are hilariously delusional. good luck with your blogging
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Good luck flying Sipher's time machine!
-
-
lolz u act like this is a slam dunk refutation of his argument when u havent even proved he was claiming what u said he was. lolz goodbye
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.