But if im not mistaken only 1 entry of the dossier is from dec 2016, the rest spans summer 2015-fall 2016
-
-
Stop. I asked you if you believe a report released in December can predict things that happen before that. Yes, or no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. So please show exactly where sipher argues that
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
So if I point to a whole slew of times he did that, you agree it's shoddy logic, even if we don't have 28 years recruiting spies behind us?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Sure -- but i read his article, and all he claimed was the dossier predated the official US intel assessment in jan 2017, which it did
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Again, if I point to numerous examples where Sipher says report that post-dated events predicted those events, you'll agree that's problem?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ive already said sure. this is getting exhausting. get to ur point or im moving on.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This is Sipher using a December report to "predict" bot activity that was widely reported in the press for months.pic.twitter.com/Tbj2JMZhhz
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
i dont have time to go thru the press from summer-fall of 16 to see what was def known & what wasnt -- but hes claiming something specific
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ghostandspooky @emptywheel and
ur point that generally it had been reported that russians were behind the hack doesnt speak to the specific claims of the dossier
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Right. Bc at that point the dossier was claiming that the kompromat in question WASN'T hacked emails.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @ghostandspooky and
Again, it's now utterly clear you didn't read the post. Maybe try to do that?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.