Those claims defy the laws of physics. I get that you're okay with that. Me? I'll adhere to the laws of physics, thanks.
-
-
Here, he claims that same December report predicted a November Oxford study.pic.twitter.com/UJvvBigIGX
-
Here he claims revelations in 2007 and 2015 prove that a dossier prepped in 2016 predicted Cohen's RU (actually, Ukr) ties.pic.twitter.com/AYnBpyqzPS
-
And all that's before his general claim that dossier that was always 3-4 weeks behind public events on hacking also predicted it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You repeated GOP talking points saying all Steele's sources were paid. I asked for a cite. You refused to give one. You're a troll. Bye.
-
Sorry: didn't see the request. I said sources were. Not all (and obviously the December report WASN'T paid for which is more problematic).
-
Grassley asserted, having gotten answers from sources on this, that they were paid on May 3. It's not a trollish comment, btw, it is normal.
-
The problem lies in the defensiveness about normal intelligence collection, and the unwillingness to explain that.
-
Do you think CIA collection is corrupt bc we pay our sources? I don't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i dont have time to go thru the press from summer-fall of 16 to see what was def known & what wasnt -- but hes claiming something specific
-
You don't have to!! That's why I laid that all out in the post. I'm getting feeling you didn't read the post.
-
i read the post and found it to be just as unconvincing as ur points are here. ur assuming hes making broad claims when what hes actually
-
Right; you've conceded that if Sipher needed a time machine to make his arg it's shit. I did that. You still believe. You're flat earther!
-
no u didnt prove that point at all. ive pointed out that sipher wasnt claiming what u said he was, and u took that to mean i agreed with u
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your use of "predict" is a misleading attack
-
You're saying it is an attack to hold Sipher to the standard he lays out? If he says "predict" I can't expect evidence of "predict"?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's not what the thing u r highlighting says.
-
What does it say?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.