Both of those would get someone laughed out of a freshman logic course.
-
-
Sure -- but i read his article, and all he claimed was the dossier predated the official US intel assessment in jan 2017, which it did
-
Again, if I point to numerous examples where Sipher says report that post-dated events predicted those events, you'll agree that's problem?
-
ive already said sure. this is getting exhausting. get to ur point or im moving on.
-
This is Sipher using a December report to "predict" bot activity that was widely reported in the press for months.pic.twitter.com/Tbj2JMZhhz
-
Here, he claims that same December report predicted a November Oxford study.pic.twitter.com/UJvvBigIGX
-
Here he claims revelations in 2007 and 2015 prove that a dossier prepped in 2016 predicted Cohen's RU (actually, Ukr) ties.pic.twitter.com/AYnBpyqzPS
-
And all that's before his general claim that dossier that was always 3-4 weeks behind public events on hacking also predicted it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.