"Broke the rules of evidence" lolz ok 
great work
Stop. I asked you if you believe a report released in December can predict things that happen before that. Yes, or no?
-
-
No. So please show exactly where sipher argues that
-
So if I point to a whole slew of times he did that, you agree it's shoddy logic, even if we don't have 28 years recruiting spies behind us?
-
Sure -- but i read his article, and all he claimed was the dossier predated the official US intel assessment in jan 2017, which it did
-
Again, if I point to numerous examples where Sipher says report that post-dated events predicted those events, you'll agree that's problem?
-
ive already said sure. this is getting exhausting. get to ur point or im moving on.
-
This is Sipher using a December report to "predict" bot activity that was widely reported in the press for months.pic.twitter.com/Tbj2JMZhhz
-
Here, he claims that same December report predicted a November Oxford study.pic.twitter.com/UJvvBigIGX
-
Here he claims revelations in 2007 and 2015 prove that a dossier prepped in 2016 predicted Cohen's RU (actually, Ukr) ties.pic.twitter.com/AYnBpyqzPS
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.