And that it was substantial enough for them to believe they can win a court case?
-
-
I think they may have miscalculated, honestly. I think the Kronos case may be fragile (but possible superseding might not be).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @VessOnSecurity and
But what normally happens for someone in MWT's position is 1) they're denied bail 2) they don't get superb attorneys. That changes things.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @VessOnSecurity and
Or, at the very least, they're denied their ability to access computers and make a living. That's why 98% of US cases end in plea agreements
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @VessOnSecurity and
In any case, what I tried to do was explain that FBI is not saying "Kronos thus arrest." They're saying "MWT WannaCry guy=online footprint"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
OK, you don't have anything new, you don't have a sound theory, you don't know any more than us. I've wasted my time reading this article.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
You're familiar with how back door searches work?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, I am also familiar that spooks-collected info is now shared and can be use by the US law enforcement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
And you're familiar that 98% of indictments end in plea agreements and therefore don't have to be proven in court?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, that's been the case for a long time and is one of the idiocies of the US legal system that jails innocents.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Fine. I wrote the piece bc every single convo I've been a part of seems to miss that you shouldn't see this as abt indictment.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.