But they have a cooperating witness, it looks like. The question is whether he's telling the truth. And that may come down to credibility.
-
-
Where do they have a cooperating witness?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I read the original indictment and it was all based on the testimony of someone redacted.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. They've redacted the ID of his co-defendant, someone named "Tran" that is prolly VinnyK. They need to include him to get to conspiracy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthew_d_green and
Govt has said repeatedly that MWT is the only one who is before the court. Nothing mentioned in discovery says cooperating.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Looking at this, you have to imagine that cooperation is at least a strong possibility.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
False. Here's what govt says they have to prove their case. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/08/24/malwaretechs-case-gets-complex/ … Unless someone handed over Jabber, no cooperation IDed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That someone handed over the Jabber seems like one of the most likely (of several) possibilities. No?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Correct. Which is why I pose it as a Q. It seems like a pretty key detail to figure out, especially for those who've Jabbered with MWT.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.