Why do you say indictment relies on unnamed co-conspirator?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @ncweaver
well, read the indictment. His alleged partner's name is redacted.
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @briankrebs @ncweaver
Yes (tho wasn't for a brief period). Govt has SPECIFICALLY said Hutchins is only one who has appeared.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Also that's not the way govt handles unnamed informants.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ncweaver
so you're saying that the person they blanked out in the indictment didn't provide evidence to the govt? Seems highly unlikely.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
The govt has already said unnamed suspect is "at large":https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/04/wannacry-marcus-hutchins-kronos-malware-arrest …
2 replies 4 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @iblametom @briankrebs and
It's almost certainly whoever is behind the VinnyK moniker:https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2017/08/06/marcus-hutchins-case-kronos-malware-not-hot-in-cybercrime/ …
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
thanks, i will update the story with a link to that.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
This is where govt says Hutchins is only one who has appeared. http://ia801504.us.archive.org/24/items/gov.uscourts.wied.77855/gov.uscourts.wied.77855.17.0.pdf …
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
thank you. I've just updated the story with a link to reporting that his alleged co-conspirator is at large. give it 3-5 min for cachexpiry
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes
TY
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.