When you're trying to make this a gender issue, instead of a "she broke the fucking law" issue.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/903802558522814464 …
-
-
Replying to @JackETorrance
Where did you get that from? Did you read the linked documents and understand there was a legal reason for noting gender?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @JackETorrance
You COULD point out that it's not Winner's place to say it was already compromised. But I noted that in the piece, so...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @JackETorrance
ALSO, as I explained, there is legal reason why the fact there were 10 male agents matters. You might figure out why b4 running your mouth.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Exposing your agenda isn't running my mouth. It's exposing your agenda. Consider yourself exposed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes. My agenda. Which is 1) noting your point 2) noting legally important details your little manhood finds offensive.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @JackETorrance
Maybe when a douchbag male who doesn't understand what he reads but runs his mouth anyway is simply (um) exposing himself?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.