When you're trying to make this a gender issue, instead of a "she broke the fucking law" issue.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/903802558522814464 …
You COULD point out that it's not Winner's place to say it was already compromised. But I noted that in the piece, so...
-
-
You specifically mention "MALE AGENTS!!! GAH!!!" several times. Also, she was not qualified to make the "compromised"" analysis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wasn't her call.
-
Yes. As noted, I mentioned that.
-
ALSO, as I explained, there is legal reason why the fact there were 10 male agents matters. You might figure out why b4 running your mouth.
-
Exposing your agenda isn't running my mouth. It's exposing your agenda. Consider yourself exposed.
-
Yes. My agenda. Which is 1) noting your point 2) noting legally important details your little manhood finds offensive.
-
Maybe when a douchbag male who doesn't understand what he reads but runs his mouth anyway is simply (um) exposing himself?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.