Rachel Maddow has now been going on for over 15 minutes about the Steele dossier, with actual news involved approximately zero.
Grassley's concerns were far more nuanced than that, and frankly had some justification.
-
-
Explain your thoughts please? Not being mean, truly interested.
-
1) Likely at least some (esp last report, which was offered up for free) was fed to Steele. 2) More likely bc of Fusion ties to Akhmetshin.
-
Pee tape notwithstanding, last report was by far the most legally damning. So fair to question whether RU disinfo.
-
I also suspect funders are far more damning than Dems want to imagine, based in part on testimony fr lawsuits.
-
I don't see how they can force Simpson to reveal his clients w/o revealing all of them. Steele offered his work to Congress
-
You're letting what you want get in the way of reality here.
-
And for everyone to put me and Marcy on the same side of something is an achievement :)
-
Nah, we've been swimming upstream in the reality-based stream for a while.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nuanced how?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.