So, no, you're not remotely familiar with the sworn testimony about the dossier but you feel okay condescending. I see.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Where the hell did I say anything about being familiar with sworn testimony? Not everything needs to be sworn testimony to be verifiable
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @truthsp3ak
Sworn court testimony is not only verifiable in news reports (which you ALSO appear unfamiliar with) but in actual court documents.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @truthsp3ak
Most people consider it MORE verifiable (tho these statements probably weren't). In any case, it's among many reasons last report is sketchy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @truthsp3ak
Had you not started by being an incredible douchebag, you might have asked what I meant and not embarrassed yourself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Nah, I think that was you making the silly point that the last part of the dossier was sketchy because it wasn't paid for
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @truthsp3ak
At the risk of being accused of condescension for pointing something REALLY, PAINFULLY obvious out, I said "a long list of reasons."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @truthsp3ak
You do know that "a long list of reasons" means "not just one reason"? Or am I being condescending by pointing that out?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @truthsp3ak
Nope. CONTINUING to be rude and condescending and kind of bitchy, though.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dhead64 @truthsp3ak
By "bitchy" you mean, "women shouldn't call condescending assholes out when they're stupid and wrong," I guess?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But thanks for rescuing Up Is Down for 3 times weighing in on stuff he admitted he didn't know about. I guess he needed reinforcements?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.