I don't know anything that's not public. "Conspiracy" is a crime and I'm just trying to figure out what crime they are reporting.
And you know that even people critical of Trump have concerns abt RU feeding Steele stuff? Do you know those basic details?
-
-
There you go again with the condescension I'm talking about things verifiable through news stories, etc prior to the dossier's release
-
So, no, you're not remotely familiar with the sworn testimony about the dossier but you feel okay condescending. I see.
-
Where the hell did I say anything about being familiar with sworn testimony? Not everything needs to be sworn testimony to be verifiable

-
Sworn court testimony is not only verifiable in news reports (which you ALSO appear unfamiliar with) but in actual court documents.
-
Most people consider it MORE verifiable (tho these statements probably weren't). In any case, it's among many reasons last report is sketchy
-
Had you not started by being an incredible douchebag, you might have asked what I meant and not embarrassed yourself.
-
Nah, I think that was you making the silly point that the last part of the dossier was sketchy because it wasn't paid for

-
At the risk of being accused of condescension for pointing something REALLY, PAINFULLY obvious out, I said "a long list of reasons."
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not talking about any hotel rendezvous
-
Now you're just making stuff up in hopes you know what I'm talking about. You don't. Perhaps you don't know as much as you pretend.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
