I don't know anything that's not public. "Conspiracy" is a crime and I'm just trying to figure out what crime they are reporting.
So you know what has been stated up in testimony before multiple court proceedings?
-
-
And you know that even people critical of Trump have concerns abt RU feeding Steele stuff? Do you know those basic details?
-
There you go again with the condescension I'm talking about things verifiable through news stories, etc prior to the dossier's release
-
So, no, you're not remotely familiar with the sworn testimony about the dossier but you feel okay condescending. I see.
-
Where the hell did I say anything about being familiar with sworn testimony? Not everything needs to be sworn testimony to be verifiable

-
Sworn court testimony is not only verifiable in news reports (which you ALSO appear unfamiliar with) but in actual court documents.
-
Most people consider it MORE verifiable (tho these statements probably weren't). In any case, it's among many reasons last report is sketchy
-
Had you not started by being an incredible douchebag, you might have asked what I meant and not embarrassed yourself.
-
Nah, I think that was you making the silly point that the last part of the dossier was sketchy because it wasn't paid for

- 17 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
