I don't know anything that's not public. "Conspiracy" is a crime and I'm just trying to figure out what crime they are reporting.
Oh. By condescending do you mean "Contrary to popular opinion"? Because I agree, that was inappropriate.
-
-
If you're going to start by being (by your measure) inappropriate, you should know all the facts abt the dossier, which you appear not to.
-
In fact I have read the dossier in it's entirety & have seen research to back it up So don't tell me what I know and what I don't

-
So you know what has been stated up in testimony before multiple court proceedings?
-
And you know that even people critical of Trump have concerns abt RU feeding Steele stuff? Do you know those basic details?
-
There you go again with the condescension I'm talking about things verifiable through news stories, etc prior to the dossier's release
-
So, no, you're not remotely familiar with the sworn testimony about the dossier but you feel okay condescending. I see.
-
Where the hell did I say anything about being familiar with sworn testimony? Not everything needs to be sworn testimony to be verifiable

-
Sworn court testimony is not only verifiable in news reports (which you ALSO appear unfamiliar with) but in actual court documents.
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.