After Charlottesville, the ACLU says it will no longer defend free-speech rights of groups marching with firearms:http://on.wsj.com/2wUWa0D
-
-
Replying to @LailaLalami @emptywheel
So, armed group w permission to march is violently attacked by leftists & no one was shot, but the guys w guns don't deserve protection....
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1. they all had permits. 2. the ACLU isn't in the bodily contact protection racket 3. no evidence there was violence against the armed group
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @minnesotajo @cryptobelfrey and
4. there is substantial evidence that the armed group were in fact the perpetrators of violence. 5. Carry on.
4 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Evidence? Heard left came to fight & seems probable given "punch a nazi" slogans. Armed ppl w desire to hurt others don't usually fist fight
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cryptobelfrey @minnesotajo and
In any case, everyone deserves = protection of free speech. Refusal to protect 1st amnd rights bc exercising 2nd amnd rights is a bad sign.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
So a bunch of people chilling other people's speech with their big guns should get free legal services?
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
The Nazis should prioritize saving for legal services if they want to do both.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.