Sorry should've clarified. It's the indictment that was already public.https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3912520-Marcus-Hutchinson-Indictment.html …
-
-
Thanks
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze @lorenzofb and
(AKA, nope, they haven't done anything to make it look more credible yet.)
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @lorenzofb and
Will be very curious to see what else, if anything, they have.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze @lorenzofb and
There's the chat log in which Hutchins allegedly said he wasn't getting enough $$, mentioned in court Friday.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @mattblaze and
But since they didn't put that in the indictment, there may be a reason they didn't put it in the indictment.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @mattblaze and
Did you request the transcript yet?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lorenzofb @mattblaze and
Nope. Hoping someone with a dedicated budget does that. Transcripts are highway robbery!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
If you're not familiar with my decades old live-blogging, I can do a near transcript on Monday AND Milwaukee allows devices.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.