I agree, but what ratio would you require to include him? named him, btw, because twitter searching urls turned him up as obviously on list
Why do you like it? Because it places utterly false stories in the NYT that you like, even if false?
-
-
no, if that's the purpose and result, then I agree with you. But I find people like Jack P interesting because so much of Ru influence fails
-
I don't understand your tweet after "because"
-
...bc they often have a horrible grasp of American culture. Who can bridge that gap and cause it to succesfully resonate in US are notable
-
So you have evidence that no one has yet shown that Jack P is actually under RU influence?
-
Just using him as a generic example. Methodology states it includes ppl who just benefit from bots, estimates 12 / 600 wrongfully included
-
Except their results show it is FAR MORE than that. And your generic example doesn't make any sense.
-
re: JP, alt-news and conspiracy is a parallel universe and it's crazy to see that for so long and suddenly short circuit into the real world
-
"Suddenly"? Alex Jones has been insanely influential for decades.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.