3 of those are 1) immediately moving goalposts 2) conflicting claims FROM DOJ 3) evidence not strong enough for indictment.
-
-
-
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
LOL. With that apparently bad faith question, I'm tuning out. Thanks for playing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
I'll take that as a yes. "evidence not strong enough for indictment." holy shit, there is no way this cannot mean "indictment is WEAK"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
Or maybe you can't distinguish between indictment and prosecution? Try that unimagined possibility, huh?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
You literally used the word "indictment".... Don't put words in my mouth please :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
Yes. But "evidence is not strong enough for an indictment" are DIFFERENT words than "indictment is weak." Words work just like code!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
I'd go back and find the tweet where I said "woah sorry for paraphrasing", but "not strong enough" and "weak" are literally synonyms
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
Sure. And they literally modify different nouns.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
Since I'm not allowed to say "Are you saying"; Could you provide an example"evidence strong enough for an indictment" w/ "weak indictment"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Your tweet is incoherent but I THINK what you're looking for is the tweet you ignored just a few minutes ago. So, done already. Gday, mate.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.