Again, this is very basic. I've been reporting on US DOJ for years. There are things to look at in early days of cases to assess strength.
-
-
3 of those are 1) immediately moving goalposts 2) conflicting claims FROM DOJ 3) evidence not strong enough for indictment.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
LOL. With that apparently bad faith question, I'm tuning out. Thanks for playing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
I'll take that as a yes. "evidence not strong enough for indictment." holy shit, there is no way this cannot mean "indictment is WEAK"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
Or maybe you can't distinguish between indictment and prosecution? Try that unimagined possibility, huh?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
You literally used the word "indictment".... Don't put words in my mouth please :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
Yes. But "evidence is not strong enough for an indictment" are DIFFERENT words than "indictment is weak." Words work just like code!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You've just taken my partial words, rearranged them, and made them...into a piece of malware!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
BRB, calling the cops.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Shit I just knew that was where this was going to end up.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.