Nope. But thanks for making things up.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
I think you've chosen the wrong posterboy for the latest "hate the FBI" scandal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
Nah. I think I am doing what I do for indictments generally, and have for years: read through the weak points. You?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It is my extensive experience that when 1) govt immediately backtracks off claims 2) hides claimed evidence there's reason for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
so uh, you're saying the indictment... looks weak?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
No. Please don't make up what I'm saying again.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Asher_Wolf
I'm not sure any other way to take this.pic.twitter.com/8iEAIxeQB8
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MegaManSec @Asher_Wolf
There are about 10 different ways you could take it. Apparently you've decided the only way it can be taken though.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, this is very basic. I've been reporting on US DOJ for years. There are things to look at in early days of cases to assess strength.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
3 of those are 1) immediately moving goalposts 2) conflicting claims FROM DOJ 3) evidence not strong enough for indictment.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That doesn't mean the case is shit. It means those are things that DOJ has a pattern of doing that sometimes indicate weak cases.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.