so, at the very least, i think the authors need to do a better job of explaining to their tool's users / audience, what the data...
-
-
... does and does _not_ mean. and the overall blackbox nature / unclear methodology doesn't exactly help either.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
this thing may well be useful. it's clear, however, that ppl don't understand the the output, and are making misguided claims on that basis.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @snowmanomics
You mean Putin doesn't want to fire Hannity? :(
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @snowmanomics
who knows what those tricksy russians want?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @snowmanomics
Oh I know!!! They're telling us to fire Hannity so we don't think Hannity's laundering to WL and embrace of Sean Rich conspiracies = RU?!?!
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror
people do hijack hashtags tho e.g. post counter info or mock people using that hashtag.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @snowmanomics @emptywheel
which may be why displaying just trending hashtags without proper contextualization may be, well, problematic
#hint1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @empiricalerror @snowmanomics
Like the time Julian Assange got credit for all the Macron Leak traffic bc so many people RTed him saying, "fucking asshole"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I remember the time I had to explain "irony" to this IBM researcher 3 years after he started doing data analysis w/o understanding it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
The researcher LOVED me bc he was an acolyte of my Dad's. But he didn't want any uncredentialed people like Lit PhDs working w/him.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.