i think the apprpropriate comparison is steele vs the kremlin lawyer. of the two were both foreign government agents? no.
-
-
We don't yet have evidence Veselnitskaya was.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
fair, but given her advocacy for official Russian gov position on Magnitsky versus Steele, it’s pretty different.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Right. It's not clear she got a payoff. Steele's sources clearly did.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
my point is equivocating Veselnitskaya with Steele. they are not the same.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Your point is measuring two different things. Steele = agent of Hillary supporter. So Q is whether Don Jr did what Steele did (pay Russians)
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JuggerKnotty and
Steele is an agent of Hillary supporter? Have any proof of this or is it something you fabricated?pic.twitter.com/DQ8PfF5qZK
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sensen2011 @emptywheel and
Then issue is never trumper may have colluded. My point remains Steele not foreign gov agent. Veselnitskaya likely is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JuggerKnotty @sensen2011 and
AGAIN. You're comparing agent to source. You need to compare Steele's sources (KREMLIN OFFICIALS) to Don Jr's (someone you accuse of ties)
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @JuggerKnotty and
This maybe changes it a little... https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/10/us/politics/donald-trump-jr-russia-email-candidacy.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Changes it a lot. EVIDENCE! EUREKA!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.