Be Careful How You Define Collusion: On the Veselnitskaya Bombshell and the Steele Dossier https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/07/10/be-careful-how-you-define-collusion-on-the-veselnitskaya-bombshell-and-the-steele-dossier/ …
-
-
Surrogate as opposed to family member. Contact attenuated: UK spy did the hiring of Russkies: UK is US ally. You ignore pattern of contacts.
-
I suppose it would be too much to ask that you click through and read before you say things that I say in the post?
-
I read it and was puzzled why your post was reduced, in the tweet headline, to clickbait.https://twitter.com/khankiso/status/884495026297982976 …
-
"Be careful of how you define collusion" is clickbait? That's the funniest thing I've heard today.
-
You know I'm referring to the follow up tweet, but now you just want to fight, so, look elsewhere for satisfying combat. Enjoy.
-
Oh. By headline you meant "not headline" and you were wrong anyway. I'm sorry you're having such a hard time w/this. Good riddance.
-
Hush, narc. Hush.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Still waiting for your evidence of this? By all accounts, it was a Never Trump GOP superpac that commissioned it first.pic.twitter.com/Vt8gZ46qrF
-
I suppose you didn't read the post where I noted that.
-
New conversation -
-
-
"The Clintons did it, too! " Trumpers really need to be more clever than that.
-
I'll let the Trumpers, which I am not, know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your server is down so I can't read this. But pretty skeptical of an equivalence here
-
Yeah, sorry. I blame
@ggreenwald -
Lol. Back up soon?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Technically, doesn't your article say the supporter/surrogate paid a firm who paid the spy who paid Russians? Lots of degrees of separation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I see no reason to slice hairs in defining collusion. Both campaigns fit my common-sense definition (no comment on legal definition). 1/
-
Were I Putin, I would have tried to collude with both campaigns. That way, no matter who wins, I have leverage. Alternatively, how 2/
-
better to expose "the corrupt nature of democracy" than to have *both* major candidates in bed with you? It would undermine American 3/
-
confidence in the government - on both sides of the isle. Imagine if everyone were as upset with government as "the left" is today. 4/end
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.